24x7 Always On - Best of Dan Gheesling streams. Roguelikes, Soulslikes, and more.
Tracking this channel since . Last updated .
24-7 @DanGheesling - !NowPlaying The Binding Of Isaac: Rebirth - Win !Airdrops by Watching
Category: Always OnLive for 5h 6m123 watching (sampled just now)
This channel was just discovered. Tracking has started; there is no history yet. How these numbers are calculated.
Warning: StreamerVitals started tracking this channel on August 13, 2026
Every figure below is measured from broadcasts we observed. Percentage changes appear only where the previous period had enough data to compare against.
No tracked streams in this period
Last counted 59 minutes ago
Highest peak we have tracked: 323 viewers on August 11, 2026.
All-time figures cover only what we have observed since we began tracking this channel on . They are not the channel’s lifetime totals on Twitch.
The same numbers the charts draw, as a table.
No aggregated statistics for this period
We have not recorded any broadcasts for this channel in the last 7 days. Figures will appear here once we observe one.
The 1 most recent of 1 tracked broadcast.
| Stream | Category | Duration | Avg viewers | Peak | Hours watched |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-7 @DanGheesling - !NowPlaying The Binding Of Isaac: Rebirth - Win !Airdrops by WatchingStatus: Live | Always On | — | — | 137 | — |
Where DanGheeslingTV's tracked airtime went in the last 7 days.
No category time recorded for this period
We have not observed this channel broadcasting in any category in the last 7 days.
Generated from the figures on this page. No estimate is stated more precisely than the measurement supports, and nothing here claims a cause.
Neutral: The highest tracked peak was 323 viewers on August 11, 2026.
Records and totals above are bounded by our own observations, which begin on August 13, 2026.
Times are UTC. Average and peak viewers come from periodic sampling of the live broadcast, so they are close estimates rather than exact platform figures. A stream marked “partial data” had gaps in our sampling; the unobserved time is excluded from its averages rather than filled in.
